How to Start a Revolution: Use Intersectionality as a Framework to Promote Student Success
Donald “DJ” Mitchell, Jr. Assistant Professor of Higher Education, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MichiganDo you want students to reach their educational goals? My guess is you answered in the affirmative. Nevertheless, we know there are several students who begin their postsecondary educations but do not finish. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (n.d.),... more
Donald “DJ” Mitchell, Jr. Assistant Professor of Higher Education, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MichiganDo you want students to reach their educational goals? My guess is you answered in the affirmative. Nevertheless, we know there are several students who begin their postsecondary educations but do not finish. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (n.d.), the six-year graduation rate for first-time, full-time undergraduate students who began college the fall of 2007 was 59 percent. That means 41 percent of student who began during the fall of 2007 either dropped out or remained enrolled after six years while pursuing a “four-year degree.” When one disaggregates the overall fall 2007 six-year graduation rate and examines graduation rates for students from marginalized and historically underrepresented populations, the percentage declines more often than not. While there are several reasons for these achievement or opportunity gaps, when students step foot on our campuses, the culture they experience influences whether many students persist toward their educational goals. We all want students to reach their educational goals, therefore, campus climates that prohibit the completion of educational goals are problematic and are antithetical to our aim to help to students. Intersectionality is a framework that was introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989. Crenshaw, a critical race theorist and legal scholar, used the term intersectionality to highlight the lived experiences of Black women, who because of the intersection of multiple marginalized identities (e.g., race, gender, class, sexual orientation), were and are left out of antidiscrimination laws that often focus on single-axis identities (e.g., just race or just gender). For example, when race is at the forefront of discrimination cases it tends to benefit Black men and when gender is at the forefront it tends to benefit White women, erasing Black women in the process. To broaden its use, I define intersectionality as “the intersection of salient socially constructed identities and the extent to which individuals or groups are oppressed or marginalized as a result of interlocking, socially constructed systems of oppression associated with those identities” (Mitchell, 2014, para. 2). U.S. higher education institutions were not created for all students. Systems of oppression (e.g., racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, etc.) have shaped higher education and the policies and practices. Although campuses have become more diverse, policy and practices that perpetuate the marginalization of continue to be used. In order for all students to succeed, U.S. higher education’s interlocking systems of oppression must be dismantled. Reflecting on Crenshaw’s articulation of intersectionality suggests we challenge all systems of oppression and their intersections within higher education. To this end, we must foster more socially just campus environments where students are more likely to succeed. To connect intersectionality to praxis—or using theory to inform practice— consider these questions:
- In what ways does having advising hours only during business hours marginalize some students?
- In what ways do requiring multiple books for a class and the prices of books marginalize some students?
- In what ways do limited or no gender-neutral restrooms marginalize some students?
- In what ways does closing housing during Christian religious holiday breaks marginalize some students?
Racism in Student Affairs Supervision
Although student affairs strives to be an inclusive profession, supervisors can still be racist in... [more]
Implementing a Divisional Assessment Plan without...
Opening General Session featuring Dr. Robin DiAnge...
Closing Session featuring Jonathan Higgins,...
The Future of Sexual Assault Prevention and Respon...
We talk to the co-chairs of the ACPA Sexual Violence Task Force about the goals of the task force... [more]
The Role of Digital Technology in Higher Education
We talk to the co-chairs of the ACPA Digital Task Force about the goal of the task force, their... [more]
Confronting the Reality of Racism
ACPA Video On Demand has released a multi-episode video series that will explore America’s... [more]
Multicultural vs. Colorblind
Dr. Kira Hudson Banks talks about the importance of adopting a multicultural perspective versus a... [more]
Diversity & Inclusion – Love Has No Labels
While the vast majority of Americans consider themselves unprejudiced, many of us unintentionally... [more]
Serendipity vs. Intentionality in Student Learning
To request a transcript of this video, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org Gavin Henning is the... [more]
Dr. Donald Mitchell: Race-Related Studies Within...
Click here to view or download a transcript of this video. Learn more about the study: Journals in... [more]
Social Justice & Inclusion Competencies: Part One
Join us in this conversation between Dr. Bridget Kelly and Vu Tran as they talk about their own... [more]